Please note that this is a theological discussion about some language that may or may not matter to you.
You have been warned.
I think there is a theological language issue with the phrase "we will be reborn with God for eternity" and all such similar phrases.
Let me explain:
The Merriam Webster definition of eternity is infinite time, that is, time without end. So eternity encompasses all of the past, the present, and the future, without limit.
That's all well and good.
However, the whole concept of eternity includes the past, the present, and the future. Meaning, that you cannot start eternity. So if we can't start or stop eternity, we cannot start being with God in heaven for eternity unless you are already with God eternally.
Do you believe that you were with God in heaven before you were born? Do you believe that you are with God in heaven right now?
It seems that unless you do, you cannot believe that you will either be with God ETERNALLY.
Perhaps this seems a little legalistic. Perhaps this seems like an overemphasis on the difference between the meanings of "eternally" and "for the rest of time."
It is.
So is the filioque. And look what damage that caused.
You have been warned.
I think there is a theological language issue with the phrase "we will be reborn with God for eternity" and all such similar phrases.
Let me explain:
The Merriam Webster definition of eternity is infinite time, that is, time without end. So eternity encompasses all of the past, the present, and the future, without limit.
That's all well and good.
However, the whole concept of eternity includes the past, the present, and the future. Meaning, that you cannot start eternity. So if we can't start or stop eternity, we cannot start being with God in heaven for eternity unless you are already with God eternally.
Do you believe that you were with God in heaven before you were born? Do you believe that you are with God in heaven right now?
It seems that unless you do, you cannot believe that you will either be with God ETERNALLY.
Perhaps this seems a little legalistic. Perhaps this seems like an overemphasis on the difference between the meanings of "eternally" and "for the rest of time."
It is.
So is the filioque. And look what damage that caused.
